The Policy promotes the principle of mutual respect by informing students of conduct which the University considers appropriate, and provides a framework and procedurally fair practices for dealing with allegations of misconduct.
The Policy promotes the principle of mutual respect by informing students of conduct which the University considers appropriate, and provides a framework and procedurally fair practices for dealing with allegations of misconduct.
2.1 This policy applies to any current or former student of the University in relation to their conduct as a student.
2.2 The University may deal with misconduct under this policy even if the student’s award has been conferred, their enrolment is terminated or they have withdrawn from their program of study before proceedings commence or are finalised.
2.3 In any case where a student is in a gathering or group of students and/or other persons and another of the group engages in activities that constitute misconduct, the student is taken to have engaged in misconduct if they did not take all reasonable steps to dissociate from the gathering or group as soon as practicable after they became aware of the misconduct.
2.4 Where the misconduct may constitute a criminal offence and may be subject to a police investigation and/or Court proceedings, then the matter must be referred to the Office of General Counsel for advice to be sought and determine (amongst other considerations) whether proceedings under this policy will be:
3.1 There is a reciprocal relationship between individual and community rights and responsibilities. All ACU students are expected to behave in a way that:
3.2 All actions under this policy are to be based on values that are consistent with the University Mission and are to be underpinned by principles of mutual respect and procedural fairness for and by all students, staff and others who may be involved.
3.3 This Policy is subject to Statute 13 on Freedom of Speech and Intellectual Freedom.
Terms used in this policy and associated procedures are consistent with the ACU Glossary of Terms. The following specific definitions also apply:
Allegation notice means the notice the University gives to a student to commence formal misconduct proceedings.
Authorised Officer is the person to whom instances of alleged student misconduct can be reported (See Schedule 1 of the Managing Student Misconduct Procedures).
Campus service order means any activity in aid of the University, or a student, of a kind which is declared by an Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean or nominee to be a campus service order for the purposes of this popcy.
Decision Maker means an Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean or a Discipline Committee.
Exclusion means a temporary cancellation of a student’s enrolment at the University for a period of up to two standard study periods; "exclude" has a corresponding meaning.
Misconduct means any inappropriate, improper or unlawful conduct by a student or of a group of students on any campus, site or University premises that includes, but is not limited to:
Student includes any current or former student of the University.
Support person means a person, other than a person with a qualification in law, whom a student designates as their support person in proceedings under this policy. A support person may only make submissions on behalf of a student if invited to do so by the Decision Maker. A support person may not be a person who was involved in, associated with, or alleged to have been involved in, or associated with, the matter under review.
Suspension means prohibition from participating in any University activity and/or the temporary denial of access to all or specified University campuses or sites at which the University conducts its activities; "suspend" has a corresponding meaning.
University activity means any activity formally associated with the University such as representative sporting activities and University organised social or community activities, activities on student placement or exchange and activities on University student accommodation.
The provisions relating to formal communications contained in the Academic Regulations will apply to any communications with students under this policy.
6.1 A Discipline Committee will not include any person who has been in the circumstances of the matter which results in an allegation of misconduct.
6.2 A Discipline Committee will be appointed by the relevant Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean and will comprise:
6.3 A quorum of the Committee is all three members.
6.4 The chairperson has a deliberative vote and, if required a casting vote.
6.5 If an Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean has previously been involved in any matter which results in an allegation of misconduct, they may not serve on the Discipline Committee. In such a case the DVC (Coordination) will appoint another Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean as Chair.
6.6 The relevant Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean must appoint a person to act as secretary to the Discipline Committee. The secretary will provide the Committee with administrative support but is not entitled to vote.
7.1 Penalties may be imposed by an Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean, or a Discipline Committee.
7.2 An Associate Vice-Chancellor or Campus Dean may impose one of more of the following penalties:
7.3 A Discipline Committee may impose any of the penalties at section 7.2 and/or one of more of the following:
7.4 Without limiting the range of penalties available, penalties which are academic in nature (namely penalties 7.3(b) to 7.3(e)) should normally be imposed only for misconduct under the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy.
7.5 In addition to, or in lieu of, the penalties above, the Discipline Committee may require that the student consult a counsellor, medical practitioner or specialist. Where such requirement is invoked in lieu of any other penalty, the substantive penalty will remain in effect until that requirement is satisfied.
8.1 Associate Vice-Chancellors or Campus Deans must maintain a record of all allegations and investigations of academic misconduct.
8.2 The Academic Registrar must keep a register of all findings of misconduct and the penalties imposed under this policy.
8.3 Misconduct records which include all documentation and the correspondence between the University and a student under this Policy are retained by the University and are disposed of according to the University's Retention and Disposal Schedule.
8.4 Where there is a finding of misconduct, a summary is maintained on the permanent student file.
8.5 Subject to the University’s Privacy Policy misconduct records may be made available:
8.6 An annual summary and analysis of misconduct findings, must be tabled at Student Administrative Lifecycle and Policy Committee (SALPC) for noting at Academic Board each year.
Date | Major, Minor or Editorial | Description of Revision(s) |
---|---|---|
29 June 2016 | Minor | Amendment to Section 3.3.2 or Procedures in line with Critical Incident Management Policy |
18 October 2017 | Minor | Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015 compliance review |
28 November 2018 | Minor | An appeal against a student conduct decision will be done in accordance with the Student Appeals Policy |
25 November 2020 | Major | Reviewed under the Academic Board Policy Development and Review Schedule |
7 July 2021 | Minor | Consequential amendments to Procedures as a result of the Student Sexual Misconduct Prevention and Response Policy review. |
We're available 9am–5pm AEDT,
Monday to Friday
If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, text us, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.